Ensite began inside a battery-storage rollout across a large logistics portfolio, where the owner's own records were wrong about one site in four, and we were the ones who paid for it.
~25% of sites with incorrect asset data and ~80% of rework tracing back to data quality. Measured on our own rollout, not surveyed from a desk.
Major REITs are hiring full-time Utility Engagement Managers to hand-maintain exactly this register. The budget line exists; we replace the drudgery in it.
The document layer is being solved for retrofit ROI and ESG reporting. Nobody is doing it for grid connection: the field that decides what can be built.
Ensite started with a grid engineer who got tired of the part of the job no one enjoys. Kasper spent years running connection frameworks and FCR pathways at Gridcon, but kept fighting the same fight on every site: agreements, DSO letters and registers that never quite agreed, and the rework that followed.
So he left the framework agreements to build the fix.
He teamed up with Elias, who'd spent his career getting real numbers out of systems everyone else called unreadable: HV-battery analysis at AUDI, industrial systems at Atlas Copco. Together they set out to build the record the grid transition runs on.
The belief hasn't changed since: the grid transition deserves software built by the people who carried the cost of getting it wrong, not by outsiders guessing at the job.
Bring one site's documents. See the verified record in 30 minutes, no commitment.